Excellent article, publié par Business (une collaboration du Washington Post et de Bloomberg), sur les raisons qui expliquent les augmentations de rémunération des CEOs américains.
En bref, la plupart des Boards croient que la rémunération de leur CEO doit être supérieure à la moyenne de leurs pairs… Il semble donc que ce soit l’attention que le Board porte au « peer benchmarking » qui explique les rémunérations excessives. À lire.
Cozy relationships and ‘peer benchmarking’ send CEOs’ pay soaring washingtonpost.com
Kevin W. Sharer’s company isn’t making money for shareholders, but he still gets hefty raises because of a pay-setting approach known as “peer…
Voir aussi cet article qui porte sur les rémunérations excessives des CEOs
90 Percent Of Corporations Think Their Executives Deserve Above-Median Pay, Driving Income Inequality thinkprogress.org
Ongoing protests on Wall Street (which have inspired similar efforts around the country) are now in their third week, with no sign of slowing down. One of the issues galvanizing the protesters is the country’s growing income inequality, which is currently the worst its been since the Great Depression. There are several factors driving this […]/p
Gouvernance | Jacques Grisé 